I really appreciated how you covered the innovation pillar. The section on open models stood out to me because it is not a topic that gets much attention in the general press. It is clear that smaller companies and researchers will need those open models if they are going to keep up with the pace of change.
Thank you for highlighting that point. The open models aspect of the AI action plan really does have far reaching effects. It enables smaller organisations and universities access to the same computing strength that large companies already enjoy. That means we could see more research breakthroughs coming from outside the usual places. It is also an interesting signal that the government recognises innovation does not only come from big technology firms but from a much wider community.
This was one of the clearest summaries of a complex policy document that I have read recently. The link between innovation and national strength was explained in a way that felt grounded rather than political.
I appreciate that. The AI action plan frames innovation as part of national capacity rather than a political talking point. Whether it is a mere lip service remains to be seen.
You are right to raise that point. The action plan has a strong focus on innovation, but it is natural to question how much of it will translate into concrete action. Policy documents can set direction but success depends on consistent follow through by agencies, proper funding and a wilingness to adapt over time. What i think stands out in this plan is the level of detail on removing barriers, building infrastructure and opening up resources to a broader group of innovators. Those commitments will be worth watching to see whether they become lasting changes rather than statements of intent.
It feels like it tries to bring attention to long term priorities instead of focusing only on immediate gains. The emphasis on funding, workforce preparation and access to resources shows that there is at least an "attempt" to make it practical. At the same time, there is always the risk that these plans slow down when political attention moves elsewhere. It will be interesting to observe whether the actions on open models and infrastructure move forward in the coming months, as these are clear tests of how serious this effort is.
I really appreciated how you covered the innovation pillar. The section on open models stood out to me because it is not a topic that gets much attention in the general press. It is clear that smaller companies and researchers will need those open models if they are going to keep up with the pace of change.
Thank you for highlighting that point. The open models aspect of the AI action plan really does have far reaching effects. It enables smaller organisations and universities access to the same computing strength that large companies already enjoy. That means we could see more research breakthroughs coming from outside the usual places. It is also an interesting signal that the government recognises innovation does not only come from big technology firms but from a much wider community.
I think it's great that someone with your qualifications unpacks crucial policy changes in a timely manner. Keep up the good work!
Best of luck on your Substack journey! I'm rooting for you.
Thanks Alan for your kind words.
This was one of the clearest summaries of a complex policy document that I have read recently. The link between innovation and national strength was explained in a way that felt grounded rather than political.
I appreciate that. The AI action plan frames innovation as part of national capacity rather than a political talking point. Whether it is a mere lip service remains to be seen.
You are right to raise that point. The action plan has a strong focus on innovation, but it is natural to question how much of it will translate into concrete action. Policy documents can set direction but success depends on consistent follow through by agencies, proper funding and a wilingness to adapt over time. What i think stands out in this plan is the level of detail on removing barriers, building infrastructure and opening up resources to a broader group of innovators. Those commitments will be worth watching to see whether they become lasting changes rather than statements of intent.
It feels like it tries to bring attention to long term priorities instead of focusing only on immediate gains. The emphasis on funding, workforce preparation and access to resources shows that there is at least an "attempt" to make it practical. At the same time, there is always the risk that these plans slow down when political attention moves elsewhere. It will be interesting to observe whether the actions on open models and infrastructure move forward in the coming months, as these are clear tests of how serious this effort is.