7 Comments
User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

What stands out is how AI goverance is simultaneosly becoming an object of regulation and a tool for it. The Dutch chatbot findings are especially revealing becasue they expose how AI can distort democratic processes even when presented as neutral information systems. The expansion from data privacy to hardware supply chains and electoral integrity signals that we're moving toward a more holistc regulatory framework.

Expand full comment
Technology Law's avatar

You make an important point about AI becoming both the subject and instrument of regulation. The Dutch findings tells us how easily systems presented as neutral can influence public decision making. The expansion you describe suggests that regulators now view AI as a structural component of governance, which raises (and continues to raise) difficult questions about oversight, legitimacy, and the limits of institutional dependence on automated tools.

Expand full comment
Erich Winkler's avatar

Great post! I enjoyed reading it!

Expand full comment
Technology Law's avatar

Thanks for reading.

Expand full comment
Johnnie Lou's avatar

I have always been sceptical about how AI might influence election results, more so for countries that do not have a free and fair election process.

Expand full comment
Technology Law's avatar

You could say it may even be more prevalent in third world countries without an enforceable constitutional process.

Expand full comment
ToxSec's avatar

Bias by ai is a great highlight! Good stuff thank you. 🟢

Expand full comment