Newsletter Issue 82: The newsletter reviews new United States AI export controls, EU AI enforcement research, UK judicial AI guidance, and Dutch regulator warnings about biased political AI chatbots.
You make an important point about AI becoming both the subject and instrument of regulation. The Dutch findings tells us how easily systems presented as neutral can influence public decision making. The expansion you describe suggests that regulators now view AI as a structural component of governance, which raises (and continues to raise) difficult questions about oversight, legitimacy, and the limits of institutional dependence on automated tools.
Great post! I enjoyed reading it!
Thanks for reading.
I have always been sceptical about how AI might influence election results, more so for countries that do not have a free and fair election process.
You could say it may even be more prevalent in third world countries without an enforceable constitutional process.
Bias by ai is a great highlight! Good stuff thank you. 🟢
You make an important point about AI becoming both the subject and instrument of regulation. The Dutch findings tells us how easily systems presented as neutral can influence public decision making. The expansion you describe suggests that regulators now view AI as a structural component of governance, which raises (and continues to raise) difficult questions about oversight, legitimacy, and the limits of institutional dependence on automated tools.